How do we choose which science stories get play?

Put this on the radio?

Last week I tried out something I haven’t done since I crossed the line from researcher to reporter. I crashed a conference. I went to the New York Structural Biology Discussion Group’s annual winter meeting. Way up on the 40th floor of 7 World Trade Center, the event included a full day of lectures and about 50 poster presentations.

Naively, I went hoping to scoop some research stories. Instead, the day lead me to some some questions about my own field. There stood hundreds of researchers, each eager to share their contributions to understanding the structure of ATP-dependent copper ion pumps, or the mechanisms of microtubule self-organization, or the pharmacology of the NMDA receptor. Each important findings in their realm, but I couldn’t imagine any as a radio story. “Oh, the glutamate-gated ion channel is in a different place on the protein than you expected?!” Nope, it just doesn’t translate.

Are some fields of science just not ripe for public consumption? I’d like to unpack those judgements of what topics make for media-worthy (pop?) science and what topics will never reach audiences outside of academic journals. In all seriousness, why doesn’t the glutamate-gated ion channel sound like something you’d hear about on the radio? Is the public just not interested in more minute science topics? Are we as reporters letting consumers down by writing off complicated topics as banal? I’m torn because I believe in being super-selective in choosing topics  to cover, I don’t want to waste my audience’s time blabbing about anything but compelling stories. But in doing so am I neglecting my journalistic duty to present truly balanced reports on science?

I’m reminded of a discussion I had a few weeks ago with a phonetics researcher. In the last month a study of hers had widely circulated in the pop press. Every article I’d read on the study completely mis-represented her findings. Was she furious? Quite the opposite. She told me she was just so glad to see phonetics research in the news, the bad journalism barely even bothered her. It seemed she’d internalized media bias against her diminutive field so much that she didn’t even think her work deserved fair coverage.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hypnic Jerk

Image from radarofchance.wordpress.com

You know that feeling of falling some people get when they’re dozing off? It’s been happening to me a lot lately, so when I had some extra time yesterday afternoon I decided to do a little research. Here’s what I found.

Listen Here Running time 87 seconds

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A new gene for depression?

David Glahn, image from brainmapping,org

Clinical depression conducts a full symphony of mischief on a person’s brain. A dampened mood, changes in blood chemistry, changes in cortical volume, impaired memory, and sleep disturbances make up some of the most commonly played behavioral and neurological symptoms. Actually, there’s over a thousand heritable trait markers of depression, says David Glahn at Yale University. He’s spent the last decade trying to track down their conductor.

His team has been the first to systematically rank all of these heritable trait markers for depression by their relevancy to the disease. By tracing the ranked trait markers back to their genes, he could decipher which genes have the most influence over the illness. To his surprise, RNF123, a gene not previously associated with depression, came out on top. On closer examination, RNF123 fits the bill as depression’s band leader. It manipulates the way neurons communicate in the hippocampus. That’s the area of the brain where anti-depressant drugs get down to work.

So what’s it matter? By pinpointing the gene behind depression, scientists have a new target for more effective anti-depressant drugs. Also, having an identifiable gene for depression could allow doctors to screen patients for susceptiblity to the illness. That way doctors could know to avoid depression-inducing medical procedures or to especially encourage counseling when the patient goes through a difficult life event.

Glahn admits his findings are still pretty preliminary. A team in Toronto has already replicated his conclusion that RNF123 plays a predominant role depression, but other groups will have to further replicate that. He’ll also have to show that RNF123 levels go up and down depending on the strength of a person’s depression symptoms. Regardless, I find this study exciting because it proposes a way of making empirical sense of the whole mess of traits that go along with a mental illness. While Glahn’s current paper may be a little too preliminary for a whole radio piece, I’d like to follow the progress of this line of research. I’d love to do a story on it when more results arrive.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Airing on The World In Words

The story I did for PRI’s The World, about language and money, re-airs (with bonus material!) this week on Patrick Cox‘s podcast, The World in Words.  You can hear it here. My piece comes right after the start of the show.

In other news, my video consulting gig has finished up and I’ll be returning to radio freelance work in the new year.  Hello you lovely mix of freedom and poverty, I’m back.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

We’re all born with a hole in the heart…

Did you know that?

It’s funny how the tangents of an interview often make for the most compelling material. Like what I learned today. Listen Here Running time 18 seconds

That’s stroke specialist Dr. Mitchell Elkind of Columbia University.

Please excuse the lack of posts lately, I’ve been full-time employed for the last couple of months as senior producer/consultant at a soon-to-be-revealed video site. I can’t say much else about it yet, but here’s me on the new gig:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Language, Money, and the Future airs on PRI’s The World

Linguist John McWhorter

My story about an economist’s curious new findings aired Monday on PRI’s The World. It’s gotten a stronger response than any story I’ve produced so far, it seems the debate over language differences really raises some passion.

Listen Here Running time 5:35

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

audreyquinnvideo!

My new office space, by my coworker Vida Angway

I started an exciting new project this last week — video production! I’m working with a tech start-up in the Village Voice building, Complex Ventures, to launch a streaming video site with an NPR sensibility. For now we’re working around the clock on pilot segments looking at NYC’s efforts to become a sustainable urban ecosystem (relevant to our office’s other work). I’m ecstatic for the chance to take my public radio skills into the private business realm and the video medium. I’d like to continue doing freelance audio work on the side, but this new project should be my main focus for the next few months.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Public Radio Programming Conference and my report

The Baltimore National Aquarium where we had our closing night

I spent last week (Sept. 20-23) at the Public Radio Programing Conference in Baltimore. I was representing AIR as a New Voices Scholar at the conference. There were 21 of us all together, of varying ages but all within about five years of first entering the radio industry. I enjoyed making my first ever trip to Baltimore and made a number of friends I hope to stay in contact with in the coming years.

Following the conference we were asked to write a report telling the story of our passion for public. I’d like to think of it as a sort of manifesto for why I make public radio. Here it is:

Some people grow up listening to public radio like other people grow up Democrat or Catholic, it’s just part of their family’s identity. Me, I’d never even tuned in to my local NPR station until just before I started interning there. But within a few months of discovering public radio, specifically science radio, I knew it would shape the rest of my life.

In late 2008 I was finally coming to terms with the fact that I might not be cut out for my current career. In college I’d channeled my fascination with brains and behavior into a neuroscience degree. Since then I’d worked in a number of research labs. I’d performed hippocampus surgery on mice, used MRI scans to measure brain volumes of children with autism, and analyzed electrical signals coming from people’s scalps when they saw pictures of faces. On paper that might sound really interesting, and I did love talking about neuroscience research and the theories behind it. But no matter how much I liked the bigger picture behind my lab duties, for me the daily reality of the work felt repetitive, lonely, and frankly, dull. I started seeking out volunteer work in hopes of discovering something I felt more excited about. While in a training to help at a woman’s shelter, I heard a lecturer make a comment about mental illness that contradicted current research. I talked with him afterward, and surprised myself by how passionate I was to share my science knowledge. “You know what?” he told me, “You should start a neuroscience podcast.”

That suggestion really caught me off guard. I’d been ready to give up on science forever, it just didn’t seem to be working out for me. I wasn’t quite ready to follow his advice, but I credit him for first giving me the idea that maybe science wasn’t wrong for me, I just needed to go about it in a different way. A few months later I met a woman from the local community radio station. She encouraged me to attend their reporter training classes. After I’d done my training and explained my research background the news director began assigning me science features. I still remember gathering my first bit of tape, a conversation with a climate change scientist. My microphone hand shook throughout the entire interview, but I loved learning about the research he’d conducted. Better yet, a few days later I heard my story on the air and realized I’d just gotten to share that learning experience with a few hundred other people. I started spending a couple of days a week at the station, addicted to the process of fine-tuning scripts, editing cuts, and mixing my own stories. I’d never done anything before that brought with it such pride and enjoyment.

Within a six month period, producing radio went from a passing fancy to something I was determined to spend the rest of my life pursuing. I knew that to move forward I needed to break into a larger audience. I started transcribing tape for a reporter at my local NPR affiliate station to figure out what this national public radio thing was all about. She helped me land the station’s reporting internship, where I learned how to produce news and feature stories for wider broadcast. I realized that if I wanted to continue spending so much time making radio I needed to get paid for it, and that wasn’t going to happen at my intern and volunteer-saturated local radio station. So a year ago I followed a whim and moved to New York City where I started getting serious about freelancing. It’s taken more focus than I ever thought I had, but the pay-off has been the excitement of getting to work with Radiolab, PRI’s The World, Deutsche Welle Radio, and a number of NPR affiliate stations. In the past few months I’ve started to realize I really have become a “real” independent radio producer, and I’m excited for the opportunities to come.

When it comes down to it, my reasons for loving public radio are largely selfish. Contributing to it is the most personally satisfying thing I’ve ever done. Sure, at least a few days a month the downsides of the business (inconsistent paychecks, diminishing outlets for independent work, the stress of constantly being on the search for my next gig) seem to outweigh the upsides. But the rest of the time I’m ridiculously in love with what I do. I get to visit interesting people I’d never usually meet and ask them questions I’d never usually feel comfortable asking. I get to write scripts to construct stories in the way I think they should be told. I get to manipulate everyday sound clips into art. And I get to feel like I really own my journalism by having my own voice present it on the radio. But there are other reasons I value public radio beyond my personal fulfillment. Radio is the technological manifestation of humanity’s oldest mode of storytelling – people talking to other people. You can accuse NPR of leaning left, and many certainly have, but I still believe public radio is the most balanced news source available. Lastly, the most unique part of public radio to me is that it presents people in action, either reporting or verite, so that listeners can share in the journalist’s learning experience as if they were right alongside them.

The PRPD conference was just the career energy shot I needed last month. I met fellow young independent producers who reminded me I’m not the only one struggling to get in to the business and inspired me with their innovative and impassioned work. I attended seminars that presented examples of the kind of radio I’d like to strive to produce. Perhaps most wonderfully, I met independent radio veterans who assured me it is possible to make a lifelong career from this work, and gave me some of the most sound and direct professional advice I’ve yet to receive. The conference strengthened my conviction that if I continue with such confidence in my work, and diligence to pushing myself, I’m going to succeed in this business.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

On the road

This last Friday I took the train from New York’s Central Station to New Haven, Connecticut. I was traveling for a story I’m working on for PRI’s The World. I interviewed Dr. Keith Chen, a behavioral economist at Yale. Dr. Chen focuses on uncovering the underlying psychological aspects of our sometimes puzzling economic behavior. My story concerns a curious correlation between our language and our savings habits.

I’ll save the details of his study for the upcoming radio story, but another interesting topic we covered was his past research in Capuchin monkeys. He conditioned the monkeys to save coins and trade them in for food treats. He was amazed by how similarly the monkeys spending and saving habits reflected those of humans, especially when it came to irrational financial behaviors. For example, researchers have found that most people care about losses about two and half times as much as they care about gains — most people won’t take a risk until the possible gain is at least two and half times greater than the possible loss. Monkey behavior showed the exact same imbalance in care for losses versus gains.

I stayed with my friend Becca, an MBA student at Yale. She gave me a lovely tour of the campus, which contains an incredible number of historic buildings. I’m always amazed by the hundreds of years of history present in East Coast architecture, the building are so much older than I’m used to seeing back on the west coast. Unfortunately I forgot to photograph those. Upon arriving home I realized the only photographic history of Yale’s grandeur I’d collected was the details of Dr. Chen’s lecture hall bathroom. See below.

My story should air on The World some time in the next month, but for this week my time will be occupied by a trip up to Baltimore. I’ll be representing AIR through their New Voices scholarship at the PRPD conference this Tuesday through Friday. I’m excited to spend the week attending lectures and getting to know more of my fellow producers!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Ghana biorefinery story to air on Word of Mouth

I’ve completed another story about the Ghana biorefinery that will air soon on NHPR’s Word of Mouth.

Listen here Running time 5:19

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment